The documentary "Predators" is gaining a lot of controversy
Dec. 16th, 2025 05:30 amI see why. Critics loved it but general audiences object to it. Ostensibly, it's because it humanizes the pedophiles on "To Catch A Predator" but really that's not an actual problem. Not really. People that evil and sick, are SHOCKER, human and vulnerable at points. That does not bother me.
I think what really riles a lot of people up is the suggestion that people watching that specific show and humiliating scenario as some form of cathartic entertainment is a fucked up thing to do. Enjoying another person's misery, no matter how shitty that person is, is a bad thing, and the entire franchise basically gave the entire viewership license to laugh at the most horrible moment of a horrible, evil person's life.
U.K. Columnist Charlie Booker once said "When a TV show makes you feel sorry for potential child-rapists, you know it is doing something wrong." And yeah, I, being an empathetic human being can't help but fucking cringe at these monsters sobbing that their lives are over. The fact that the viewership of that show instead felt SATISFIED watching that is quite fucked up.
Regardless of whether sympathy for monsters should or shouldn't exist, that is missing the forest for the trees. The idea that something so grotesque was being used as a form of weekly entertainment for a bloodthirsty viewing public is the actual fucking problem.
The show did its share of public service, and yes, its share of damage. But ultimately, I think people watched it for the same reason they watched Springer: They got off on other enjoying people's misery. People don't want to hear that a show that took so many potential child-rapists off the street is that level of garbage and trash. But it is and it always was.
I think what really riles a lot of people up is the suggestion that people watching that specific show and humiliating scenario as some form of cathartic entertainment is a fucked up thing to do. Enjoying another person's misery, no matter how shitty that person is, is a bad thing, and the entire franchise basically gave the entire viewership license to laugh at the most horrible moment of a horrible, evil person's life.
U.K. Columnist Charlie Booker once said "When a TV show makes you feel sorry for potential child-rapists, you know it is doing something wrong." And yeah, I, being an empathetic human being can't help but fucking cringe at these monsters sobbing that their lives are over. The fact that the viewership of that show instead felt SATISFIED watching that is quite fucked up.
Regardless of whether sympathy for monsters should or shouldn't exist, that is missing the forest for the trees. The idea that something so grotesque was being used as a form of weekly entertainment for a bloodthirsty viewing public is the actual fucking problem.
The show did its share of public service, and yes, its share of damage. But ultimately, I think people watched it for the same reason they watched Springer: They got off on other enjoying people's misery. People don't want to hear that a show that took so many potential child-rapists off the street is that level of garbage and trash. But it is and it always was.